What Principle Drives Informed Consent? 5 Expert Insights for 2024

Wil Flanagan
September 27, 2024
In an era where data is king and research ethics are under constant scrutiny, the principle of informed consent stands as a cornerstone of ethical practice. But what really drives this crucial concept? As we step into 2024, the landscape of informed consent is evolving, shaped by technological advancements and a deeper understanding of human autonomy.

This article delves into the heart of informed consent, exploring its foundational principle and offering expert insights for navigating this complex terrain. Whether you're a researcher, healthcare professional, or simply curious about the ethics that govern our most sensitive information, you'll find valuable takeaways to enhance your understanding and practice.

Key takeaways:

  • The fundamental principle driving informed consent
  • How technology is reshaping consent processes
  • Balancing beneficence and autonomy in ethical dilemmas
  • The rise of continuous and dynamic consent models
  • Strategies for ensuring voluntary participation in diverse settings

Let's unpack the nuances of informed consent and discover how it's adapting to meet the challenges of our rapidly changing world.

What is informed consent and what principle drives it?

Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical research and healthcare, embodying the fundamental principle of respect for persons.

Let's explore its meaning and significance in 2024 and beyond.

Definition of informed consent

Informed consent is a process that empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their health or participation in research. It goes beyond a mere signature, ensuring that patients or research participants understand and voluntarily agree to a proposed treatment or study.

Key components of informed consent include:

  1. Clear communication of information in simple, understandable language
  2. Comprehensive disclosure of risks, benefits, and alternatives
  3. Verification of the individual's decision-making capacity
  4. Assurance of voluntariness without coercion
  5. Proper documentation of the consent

For instance, under Ohio law, if an individual is under 18, their parent, guardian, or authorized person must sign for them. Healthcare providers must also determine if the individual has the capacity to understand the agreement and its implications.

The principle of respect for persons

The driving force behind informed consent is the principle of respect for persons. This ethical principle recognizes individuals' inherent dignity and autonomy, affirming their right to make decisions about their own bodies and lives.

Respect for persons means:

  • Treating individuals as autonomous agents capable of self-determination
  • Protecting those with diminished autonomy
  • Ensuring truly voluntary participation in any procedure or research

This principle has evolved significantly over time, shaped by historical events like the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The Nuremberg Code, the Belmont Report, and subsequent regulations have contributed to our current understanding and implementation of informed consent.

Importance in research and healthcare

Informed consent serves crucial ethical, legal, and personal functions:

  • Ethically, it protects individual autonomy, ensures transparency, and builds trust between healthcare providers/researchers and patients/participants.
  • Legally, it's mandated by various regulations, including U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidelines (45 CFR 46) and state laws like Ohio's Revised Code Title 23 Section 2317.54.
  • For patients and participants, it empowers decision-making aligned with personal values, protects against potential harm, and safeguards against coercion or exploitation.

Expert Tip: In 2024, consider leveraging technology to enhance the informed consent process. Interactive digital consent forms can improve understanding and engagement while ensuring all necessary information is conveyed clearly.

As medical technology advances and research studies become more complex, the importance of informed consent continues to grow. It's not just a legal obligation—it's a fundamental ethical practice that respects human dignity and autonomy. By prioritizing clear communication, comprehensive disclosure, and voluntary participation, we uphold the principle of respect for persons and protect the rights of patients and research participants alike.

Expert Insight 1: Autonomy and Comprehension in Informed Consent

Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical healthcare and research practices, and at its heart lie two crucial elements: autonomy and comprehension. Let's explore how these principles shape the informed consent process and examine strategies to enhance them in 2024.

Understanding autonomy in healthcare and research

Autonomy in healthcare and research refers to the patient's or participant's right to make informed decisions about their own care or participation. It's rooted in the concept of bodily integrity and personal liberty, emphasising the individual's freedom to choose or refuse medical treatments and procedures.

Why is autonomy so crucial for informed consent? It ensures that people aren't just passive recipients of care or research subjects. Instead, they're active partners in the process. This respect for individual choice builds trust between patients and healthcare providers, and between researchers and participants. It's the difference between feeling like you're being told what to do and feeling like you're part of the decision-making team.

For instance, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has emphasised the importance of informed consent, particularly in teaching hospitals, where patients must be informed and consent to sensitive examinations conducted for teaching purposes. Without autonomy, patients may undergo procedures they do not understand or agree with, which can erode trust in the healthcare system and violate their personal rights.

The role of comprehension in informed consent

Comprehension is vital for autonomous decision-making because it ensures that patients or participants fully grasp the risks, benefits, and alternatives of the proposed treatment or research. This understanding allows them to make informed decisions that align with their values and preferences.

Think of it like this: if someone asks you to play a new board game but doesn't explain the rules, how can you decide if you want to play? In the same way, patients and research participants need to understand the implications of a treatment or study before they can give meaningful consent.

What happens when there's a lack of understanding? It can lead to some serious problems. Patients might agree to treatments they're not comfortable with, or researchers might enroll participants who don't fully grasp what they're signing up for. This can result in regret, mistrust, and even legal issues down the line. For example, the Montgomery case in the UK established that a doctor must take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment, and of any reasonable alternative treatments. Failure to do so can lead to legal consequences.

Strategies for enhancing autonomy and comprehension

So, how can we make sure people truly understand and can make autonomous decisions? Here are some effective strategies:

  1. Use plain language and cultural adaptation: Ditch the medical jargon and speak in a way that's easy to understand. The FDA draft guidance recommends presenting key information in a clear and concise manner, using plain language to facilitate understanding. Cultural adaptation involves tailoring the consent process to the patient's cultural background, which can enhance understanding and trust.
  2. Visual aids and multimedia approaches: Use diagrams, videos, or even interactive apps to explain complex concepts. The FDA guidance suggests using alternate formats like bubble formats with rounded boxes to capture discrete units of information, which can improve comprehension.
  3. Teach-back method and decision aids: After explaining something, ask the person to explain it back in their own words. This helps spot any misunderstandings. Decision aids, like charts comparing different options, can also help people weigh their choices more easily. These methods are particularly useful in ensuring that patients understand sensitive examinations and procedures, as emphasised by CMS.

Challenges to autonomy and comprehension in informed consent

Of course, enhancing autonomy and comprehension isn't always straightforward. Here are some hurdles we need to overcome:

  1. Capacity issues and cognitive barriers: Some patients might have conditions that affect their ability to understand or make decisions. Healthcare providers must adapt their communication strategies to address these challenges. For example, using simple language and visual aids can help overcome cognitive barriers.
  2. External pressures or coercion: Sometimes, family members or even healthcare providers might unintentionally influence a person's decision. It's crucial to ensure that the individual's choice is truly their own. The CMS guidance emphasises the importance of obtaining informed consent from patients before allowing practitioners or supervised medical students to perform sensitive examinations, highlighting the need to protect patients from undue influence.
  3. Language and cultural differences: In our diverse world, language barriers and cultural misunderstandings can complicate the consent process. Using interpreters and culturally sensitive approaches is key to bridging these gaps. The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) within HHS has underscored the importance of ensuring that policies and practices related to sensitive examinations do not discriminate against patients based on sex, race, national origin, age, or disability.
Bottom line:
  • Autonomy in healthcare means respecting a patient's right to make informed decisions about their care.
  • Comprehension is crucial for making truly informed choices and maintaining trust in the healthcare system.
  • Using plain language, visual aids, and teach-back methods can significantly improve understanding and decision-making.
  • Challenges like cognitive barriers, external pressures, and cultural differences need to be addressed to ensure genuine informed consent.
  • Enhancing autonomy and comprehension in informed consent leads to better patient outcomes, more ethical research practices, and reduced legal risks.
  • Staying updated with current guidelines and best practices is essential for healthcare providers to maintain high standards of informed consent.

By focusing on these principles, we can ensure that informed consent isn't just a box to tick, but a meaningful process that respects individuals and leads to better healthcare and research outcomes. Understanding the dimensions of patient autonomy can further enhance the informed consent process and improve overall patient care.

For researchers and healthcare professionals looking to navigate the complexities of ethical research, IRB services can provide invaluable guidance and support in ensuring that informed consent processes meet the highest ethical standards.

Expert Insight 2: Voluntariness as a Key Component of Informed Consent

Voluntariness is a cornerstone of informed consent, ensuring that participants make decisions freely and autonomously. Let's explore this crucial aspect and how it shapes ethical practices in healthcare and research.

Understanding voluntariness in informed consent

Voluntariness in informed consent refers to the principle that participants must make decisions without coercion, undue influence, or manipulation. This concept is fundamental to respecting individual autonomy and dignity.

Several factors can compromise voluntariness:

  1. Coercion: This involves threats or intimidation to influence a decision. For example, a healthcare provider might inadvertently coerce a patient by implying that treatment will be withheld if consent is not given.
  2. Undue influence: This occurs when a person's decision is influenced in a way that undermines their autonomy. Power imbalances, such as those between healthcare providers and patients, can contribute to this.
  3. Manipulation: This involves using information or tactics to sway a decision unfairly. For instance, withholding information about risks or benefits to influence a participant's choice.

Ensuring voluntary participation

To safeguard voluntariness, we must implement strategies that minimize undue influence and address power imbalances in healthcare and research settings.

Strategies to minimize undue influence

  1. Clear communication: Present information in a clear, concise manner using plain language. The FDA recommends using visual aids and a 'bubble format' with rounded boxes to capture discrete units of information, improving comprehension.
  2. Multiple communication modes: Utilize various methods such as written, oral, or visual aids to cater to different learning styles. The FDA's draft guidance encourages flexibility, suggesting the use of written, oral, media (illustrations or video), and electronic consent.
  3. Opportunity for questions: Provide ample chances for participants to seek clarification. Include contact information for researchers or healthcare providers, allowing participants to ask questions at any time.

Addressing power imbalances in healthcare and research settings

  1. Training for investigators: Educate researchers and healthcare providers to recognize and mitigate power imbalances. The CMS revisions to Hospital Interpretive Guidelines emphasize the importance of clear communication and avoiding coercion or undue influence.
  2. Independent witnesses: Involve impartial observers in the consent process, particularly for sensitive examinations or procedures. This helps ensure that the participant's decision is voluntary and not influenced by the investigator or healthcare provider.
  3. Patient advocacy: Encourage the presence of patient advocates or family members to support participants in decision-making, helping to balance power dynamics.

Special considerations for vulnerable populations

Informed consent in pediatric settings

When working with minors, informed consent becomes more complex:

  1. Parental or guardian consent: Obtain consent from a parent or legal guardian while involving the child in the decision-making process to the extent possible.
  2. Assent: Ask capable children for their agreement to participate, even if they can't legally provide consent. Tailor the assent process to the child's age and maturity level.
  3. Special protections: Pediatric research often requires additional safeguards, including review by an Institutional Review Board (IRB) with expertise in pediatric research.

Considerations for individuals with cognitive impairments

  1. Capacity assessment: Determine whether an individual with cognitive impairments can provide informed consent through a formal capacity assessment by a qualified professional.
  2. Surrogate decision-makers: If an individual lacks capacity, involve a surrogate decision-maker (e.g., family member or legal guardian) in the consent process.
  3. Simplified information: Present information in an understandable way, using plain language and visual aids as recommended by the FDA's draft guidance.
Bottom line:
  • Voluntariness is essential for respecting autonomy and dignity in informed consent.
  • Clear communication using plain language and visual aids is crucial for ensuring understanding.
  • Strategies like training investigators and using independent witnesses help mitigate power imbalances.
  • Special protections are necessary for vulnerable populations, including tailored consent processes for pediatric and cognitively impaired individuals.
  • Informed consent is an ongoing process, requiring continuous communication and the opportunity for participants to withdraw or continue based on new information.

By prioritizing voluntariness in informed consent, we uphold ethical standards and ensure that participants in healthcare and research make truly autonomous decisions.

Expert Insight 3: Ethical Dilemmas in Informed Consent

Informed consent, while a fundamental principle in research and healthcare, often presents complex ethical challenges. Let's explore some of these dilemmas and how they're navigated in various contexts.

Balancing Beneficence and Autonomy

One of the most significant ethical tensions in informed consent arises from balancing beneficence (doing good) with respect for patient autonomy. This often manifests as a clash between paternalism and patient choice.

Paternalism, where healthcare providers make decisions on behalf of patients with the intention of protecting them, can conflict with the principle of autonomy. The Nuremberg Code, Declaration of Helsinki, and Belmont Report all emphasize the importance of respecting patient autonomy. However, in practice, this balance isn't always straightforward.

Consider this scenario: A patient with terminal cancer refuses chemotherapy, opting instead for alternative therapies. The oncologist believes chemotherapy offers the best chance for extending life, but must respect the patient's informed decision. This illustrates the tension between beneficence (the doctor's desire to provide life-extending treatment) and autonomy (the patient's right to choose their care).

Another challenging situation arises when patients aren't fully competent to make decisions. For instance, a patient with early-stage dementia may wish to participate in a clinical trial, but their family disagrees due to concerns about potential risks. In such cases, healthcare providers must navigate between paternalistic interventions and respecting the patient's previously expressed wishes or values. This often requires a psychiatric evaluation to determine competency.

To address these challenges, implementing robust ethical review processes using specialized software like Ethics RM can help ensure that all aspects of beneficence and autonomy are carefully considered in research and clinical settings.

Informed Consent in Emergency Situations

Emergency situations present unique challenges to the informed consent process. When time is of the essence, the principle of non-maleficence (do no harm) often takes precedence.

In life-threatening emergencies, informed consent may be waived. However, it's crucial to document this decision and inform the patient or their surrogate decision-maker as soon as possible. The Joint Commission emphasizes the importance of documenting all elements of informed consent, even in emergency situations.

To navigate these scenarios, healthcare providers often rely on proxy decision-makers. These may include family members or legal guardians who can provide consent on behalf of the patient. It's essential to follow the hierarchy of decision-makers as determined by state laws.

Strategies for obtaining consent in urgent care include:

  1. Rapid consent protocols: Develop streamlined consent forms for common emergency procedures.
  2. Use of multimedia tools: Employ visual aids or short videos to quickly explain procedures and risks.
  3. Two-step consent process: Obtain initial verbal consent for immediate treatment, followed by full written consent when the situation stabilizes.

When time allows, providers should communicate essential information about procedures, risks, and benefits as clearly and briefly as possible. Effective communication is key to ensuring that patients or their surrogates are adequately informed, even in urgent care settings.

Global Perspectives on Informed Consent

As research and healthcare become increasingly global, it's crucial to consider cultural variations in autonomy and decision-making.

Different cultures may have varying levels of respect for individual autonomy. For example, in some East Asian cultures, family-centered decision-making is more common, with the eldest son often playing a key role in medical decisions. In contrast, Western cultures typically prioritize individual patient autonomy.

To address these challenges, consent processes should be adapted to respect local cultural norms and values. This might involve:

  1. Using appropriate language and providing interpreters when necessary.
  2. Involving family members or community leaders in the decision-making process where culturally relevant.
  3. Adapting consent forms to include culturally specific information or concerns.

For instance, in some indigenous communities, obtaining community consent may be necessary before approaching individual participants for research studies.

It's also important to consider health literacy levels when obtaining informed consent. Studies have shown that only 26.4% of consent forms include the four basic elements of informed consent (nature of the procedure, risks, benefits, and alternatives), highlighting the need for clearer and more accessible communication.

Specialized software like Ethics RM can be customized to accommodate these cultural variations, ensuring that informed consent processes are both ethically sound and culturally sensitive.

Bottom line:
  • Balancing beneficence and autonomy requires careful consideration of individual cases, effective communication, and respect for patient values.
  • In emergency situations, informed consent processes may be adapted using rapid protocols and proxy decision-makers, while still prioritizing patient rights.
  • Cultural sensitivity is crucial when obtaining informed consent in diverse populations, requiring adaptation of processes to local norms and values.
  • Ethical dilemmas in informed consent underscore the need for robust systems and processes to ensure patient rights and dignity are respected across various healthcare contexts.
  • Utilizing specialized software and tools can help navigate these complex ethical landscapes more effectively, ensuring compliance and ethical integrity.

To further explore the complexities of informed consent in various research contexts, consider reviewing clinical research compliance guidelines for additional insights.

Expert Insight 4: The Impact of Technology on Informed Consent

In today's digital age, technology is revolutionising the way we approach informed consent in research and healthcare. As we look ahead to 2024, it's crucial to understand how these advancements are shaping the consent process and what it means for both researchers and participants.

Digital tools for informed consent

Electronic consent forms are rapidly becoming the norm, offering a more streamlined and accessible approach to obtaining informed consent. These digital forms can be easily updated and standardised, ensuring all participants receive consistent information. For instance, dynamic consent models allow participants to update their preferences over time, giving them more control over their data usage throughout a study. This approach is particularly beneficial for biobanks and can be adapted for decentralised clinical trials (DCTs), fostering ongoing participant involvement.

Interactive multimedia consent processes are taking things a step further. Videos, interactive presentations, and even chatbots are being employed to make the consent process more engaging and comprehensible. A systematic review found that such digital technologies improved early comprehension in 70% of studies analysed. This is particularly beneficial for complex trials or when dealing with diverse participant groups. Design speed-dating workshops have explored these dimensions, identifying best practices such as being concise, promoting transparency, and cultivating trust.

Benefits and challenges of technology in informed consent

The benefits of technology in informed consent are significant. Improved accessibility means that participants in remote or underserved areas can now be reached more easily, broadening the scope of research studies. This is especially important for DCTs, which move trial activities from clinical settings to participants' immediate surroundings. Consistency is another major advantage – electronic forms ensure that all participants receive the same information, reducing variability and improving the overall quality of the consent process.

However, these advancements don't come without challenges. Data privacy and security are paramount concerns when dealing with digital consent processes. As we collect and store sensitive participant information electronically, robust security measures must be in place to prevent data breaches and unauthorised access. It's crucial that these digital processes adhere to strict data protection regulations to maintain participant trust and study integrity. The NIH emphasises the importance of aligning data management and sharing plans with consent language to ensure ethical standards are met.

Future trends in technology-assisted informed consent

Looking ahead, AI and machine learning applications are set to play a significant role in the future of informed consent. These technologies can personalise the consent process, tailoring information to individual needs and comprehension levels. AI-driven chatbots, for example, could provide instant responses to participant queries, enhancing understanding and engagement. Machine learning can also automate certain aspects of the consent process, such as data management and follow-up communications, making the process more efficient without compromising quality.

Virtual reality (VR) is another exciting frontier in consent education. While still in its early stages, VR has the potential to create immersive experiences that help participants better understand complex procedures or study protocols. Imagine being able to 'walk through' a clinical trial process in a virtual environment before consenting – this could dramatically improve participant comprehension and decision-making, especially for complex or high-risk procedures.

Bottom line: Key insights
  • Digital tools are enhancing accessibility and consistency in informed consent, making the process more efficient and standardised.
  • Interactive multimedia approaches improve participant comprehension and satisfaction, with the potential for personalisation.
  • Data privacy and security remain critical concerns that must be addressed when implementing digital consent processes.
  • AI and machine learning offer opportunities for personalisation and automation in consent procedures, potentially improving efficiency and engagement.
  • Virtual reality shows promise in revolutionising consent education through immersive experiences, particularly for complex studies.
  • The future of technology-assisted informed consent will focus on improving participant understanding and trust while maintaining robust data protection.
  • Despite technological advancements, the core principle of informed consent – respect for persons – remains paramount.

As we embrace these technological advancements, it's crucial to remember that technology should serve to enhance, not replace, the human element in this vital process. The ethical foundations of informed consent must continue to guide the implementation of these innovative tools. Clinical research compliance remains a critical factor in ensuring the responsible use of technology in informed consent processes.

Expert Insight 5: Continuous Consent and Dynamic Consent Models

In the rapidly evolving landscape of research ethics, continuous consent and dynamic consent models are emerging as powerful tools to address the limitations of traditional one-time consent processes.

These innovative approaches are reshaping how we think about informed consent principles, particularly in longitudinal studies and biobanking. Let's explore these concepts and their implications for research in 2024 and beyond.

The concept of continuous consent

Why one-time consent may not be sufficient

Traditional one-time consent models are increasingly seen as inadequate in modern research settings for several reasons:

  • Research objectives and data usage can change significantly over time
  • Participant preferences may evolve throughout the study
  • Static approaches fail to account for the dynamic nature of knowledge production, especially in qualitative research
  • Complex medical protocols in clinical studies may require ongoing participant understanding and agreement

Continuous consent addresses these shortcomings by allowing participants to review, modify, or revoke their consent as circumstances change. This ongoing process ensures that participants remain truly informed and in control throughout the research journey.

Implementing ongoing consent processes

Implementing continuous consent involves:

  • Regular communication between researchers and participants
  • Digital interfaces that provide real-time updates and allow easy adjustment of consent preferences
  • Incorporating continuous negotiations of informed consent and dissent, both explicit and implicit
  • Tracking and managing consent preferences to maintain participant trust and ensure relevance

For example, in a long-term clinical trial, participants might receive monthly updates on the study's progress and any protocol changes, with the option to adjust their involvement or withdraw at any point.

Dynamic consent models

Definition and key features

Dynamic consent is an approach that enables ongoing two-way communication between participants and data users or custodians. It uses digital interfaces to give participants real-time control over their data usage.

Key features of dynamic consent include:

  1. Personalization: Interfaces tailored to individual preferences, allowing participants to choose how and when they're contacted and what information they receive.
  2. Flexibility: Participants can consent to a range of data uses, from broad consent for low-risk research to specific consent for high-risk proposals.
  3. Ongoing communication: Regular updates on new research opportunities, findings, and changes keep participants informed and engaged.
  4. Accountability and transparency: Clear mechanisms for tracking data use enhance trust and ensure regulatory compliance.

Applications in longitudinal studies and biobanking

Dynamic consent is particularly valuable in:

  • Longitudinal studies: Allows participants to adjust their consent as new research opportunities arise or as their personal preferences change over extended periods.
  • Biobanking: Supports data sharing while maintaining participant control and transparency, critical for ensuring that data use aligns with participant wishes.

For instance, a biobank using dynamic consent might allow participants to specify which types of research their samples can be used for, and update these preferences as new studies emerge.

Challenges and opportunities in implementing continuous and dynamic consent

Technological requirements

  • Developing user-friendly, secure digital interfaces capable of handling complex consent preferences
  • Ensuring robust encryption and strict access controls for data handling
  • Addressing the digital divide to provide equal access for all participants, regardless of technological proficiency

Ethical considerations

  • Managing consent fatigue, where frequent consent updates may lead to participant disengagement
  • Balancing the need for ongoing consent with the risk of overwhelming participants
  • Ensuring clear, understandable information provision and respecting participant autonomy

Potential benefits for research and participant engagement

  • Enhanced trust through transparent, ongoing communication and participant control over data
  • Increased participation and retention, particularly crucial in longitudinal studies
  • Better data management, ensuring data use aligns with participant preferences
  • More accurate and reliable research outcomes due to improved participant engagement and data governance
Bottom line:
  • Continuous consent is essential in modern research, addressing the limitations of one-time consent models
  • Dynamic consent empowers participants with real-time control over their data, enhancing transparency and trust
  • Personalization and flexibility are key features of effective dynamic consent interfaces
  • Ongoing communication between researchers and participants is crucial for maintaining informed consent
  • While technological and ethical challenges exist, the benefits for research integrity and participant engagement are significant
  • Implementing continuous and dynamic consent can lead to more ethical, transparent, and participant-centred research practices in 2024 and beyond

Summary of Informed Consent as an Important Outcome of the Principle of Respect for Persons

Informed consent is a crucial ethical practice in healthcare and research, stemming from the fundamental principle of respect for persons.

This principle recognizes the inherent dignity and autonomy of individuals, affirming their right to make decisions about their own bodies and lives. Throughout this article, we've explored how informed consent embodies this principle through its key components: clear communication, comprehensive disclosure, and voluntary participation.

  • Review and update: Review and update your informed consent processes to ensure they align with current ethical standards and technological advancements.
  • Enhance comprehension: Implement strategies to enhance participant comprehension, such as using plain language and multimedia approaches.
  • Adopt continuous consent: Consider adopting continuous or dynamic consent models for long-term studies to maintain ongoing participant engagement and autonomy.
  • Stay informed: Stay informed about emerging technologies and their potential to improve the informed consent process.
  • Assess ethical dilemmas: Regularly assess and address ethical dilemmas in your consent procedures, particularly when working with vulnerable populations.

As we navigate the evolving landscape of informed consent, remember that at its core, it's about respecting each individual's right to make informed decisions about their health and participation in research. How will you enhance your approach to informed consent to better honor this fundamental principle?

Infonetica

Top Picks For You

View all