A History of Informed Consent in Research

Wil Flanagan
September 27, 2024

The history of informed consent dates back as early as the 16th century, with its principles evolving significantly since the 1940s.

Informed Consent in Research is the cornerstone of ethical research, safeguarding participants' rights and ensuring their voluntary involvement. Understanding its rich history is essential for researchers, ethics committees, and participants alike, as it illuminates how past events have shaped the ethical standards that govern research today.

This article will take you on a captivating journey through the evolution of informed consent, from its early origins to contemporary practices. You'll gain valuable insights into how this critical concept has developed over time, profoundly influencing research ethics and shaping the way we conduct studies in the modern era.

Key takeaways:

  • Early beginnings: Explore the roots of informed consent from the 16th century to post-World War II developments, revealing its long-standing importance in research ethics.
  • Ethical milestones: Discover how pivotal events and documents like the Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki revolutionised research ethics and informed consent practices.
  • Regulatory evolution: Understand the implementation of federal regulations and the crucial role of Institutional Review Boards in formalising and standardising consent processes.
  • Modern challenges: Examine ongoing issues such as complex documentation and cultural barriers that complicate the process of obtaining truly informed consent.
  • Recent advancements: Learn about the impact of the 2017 Common Rule revisions on improving consent procedures and enhancing participant understanding.
  • Future directions: Gain insight into current research focused on refining consent processes, addressing emerging ethical challenges, and adapting to new technologies in research.

What is the History of Informed Consent in Research?

Informed consent in research is a vital process that empowers participants to make voluntary, informed decisions about their involvement in studies. It's not just a box to tick – it's a fundamental ethical principle that safeguards participants' rights and well-being.

At its core, informed consent involves:

  • Providing comprehensive study information
  • Explaining potential risks and benefits
  • Ensuring participants understand their role
  • Obtaining voluntary agreement to participate

The history of informed consent is a fascinating journey spanning centuries. Let's take a quick look at its evolution:

  • 16th-18th centuries: Early ideas of patient consent emerge in medical practice
  • 1947: The Nuremberg Code establishes voluntary consent as essential in human experimentation
  • 1964: The Declaration of Helsinki sets international standards for research ethics
  • 1974: Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are established in the United States
  • 2017: Revisions to the Common Rule aim to improve the informed consent process

Key figures have shaped this concept throughout history. Henry K. Beecher's 1966 report exposed severe ethical violations in prominent American research studies, catalysing significant changes in research ethics. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has also played a crucial role by establishing specific requirements for informed consent in clinical trials.

We've witnessed informed consent evolve from a simple idea to a cornerstone of ethical research. It's now an essential part of maintaining scientific integrity and protecting participants' rights. As researchers, we're committed to upholding these standards in all our work.

Bottom line: Informed consent has evolved significantly over centuries, becoming a cornerstone of ethical research practices. From its early beginnings to modern-day implementations, the concept has been refined to better protect participants' rights and ensure the ethical conduct of research. Today, it stands as a crucial element in maintaining the integrity and ethical standards of scientific inquiry.

Early Beginnings: The Genesis of Informed Consent

Imagine being subjected to a medical experiment without your knowledge or agreement. Unthinkable today, but this was once reality. This is where informed consent comes in - a crucial process of obtaining permission from patients or research participants after explaining all risks and benefits. But how did this vital concept evolve?

The early beginnings of informed consent can be traced back to the 16th century, marking the start of a remarkable journey towards patient autonomy and ethical research practices.

In those early days, medical decision-making was dominated by paternalistic medicine. Physicians held almost absolute authority, often making decisions without consulting patients. Can you imagine having no say in your own treatment? Fortunately, as societal values shifted, so did the doctor-patient relationship.

The 18th and 19th centuries brought significant legal developments that would later influence research ethics. The concept of assault and battery emerged from English Common Law, establishing that surgeons must obtain authorization before performing procedures. This legal principle laid the groundwork for our modern understanding of informed consent.

Notable early cases in the 20th century highlighted the growing need for consent in medical practice and research. For instance, the 1914 case of Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital involved a patient who explicitly refused surgery but was operated on anyway. The court's ruling that every adult has the right to determine what happens to their own body was a watershed moment in medical ethics.

As medical ethics continued to evolve, patient autonomy emerged as a central principle. A series of judicial decisions in the early 20th century firmly established that patients have the right to make informed decisions about their medical care and participation in research.

Bottom line: The roots of informed consent can be traced back centuries, with its importance growing as medical ethics evolved. From the paternalistic approaches of ancient medicine to the recognition of patient autonomy in the 20th century, the journey of informed consent reflects a fundamental shift in how we view the rights and dignity of individuals in medical and research settings. This evolution laid the foundation for the robust ethical frameworks that guide modern research practices, ensuring that your rights as a patient or research participant are protected.

The Nuremberg Code and Post-World War II Developments

Have you ever wondered why informed consent is so crucial in research today? The answer lies in the dark history of World War II and its aftermath.

The atrocities committed during World War II, particularly the unethical medical experiments conducted by Nazi physicians, shook the world's conscience. These horrific acts highlighted the urgent need for stringent ethical guidelines in human subject research.

In response to these wartime atrocities, the Nuremberg Code was established in 1947. This groundbreaking document outlined ten standards for ethical medical behaviour, with voluntary informed consent being the cornerstone requirement.

Key points of the Nuremberg Code:

  • Voluntary consent is absolutely essential
  • Research should yield fruitful results for the good of society
  • Experiments should avoid unnecessary physical and mental suffering
  • The degree of risk should never exceed the humanitarian importance of the problem

Building upon the Nuremberg Code, the World Medical Association introduced the Declaration of Helsinki in 1964. This document further refined and expanded the ethical principles governing medical research involving human subjects. The Declaration has undergone several revisions over the years to address evolving ethical challenges in research.

These seminal documents profoundly shaped informed consent practices in research. They established the fundamental principle that participation in research must be voluntary and based on a clear understanding of the risks and benefits involved. Researchers were now required to provide comprehensive information to potential participants and obtain their explicit consent before proceeding with any study.

The impact of the Nuremberg Code extended far beyond its initial creation, significantly influencing international guidelines and ensuring that medical research involving human subjects adheres to strict ethical standards. This led to the development of institutional review boards (IRBs) and ethics committees worldwide, tasked with overseeing research protocols and safeguarding participants' rights.

Bottom line: The atrocities of World War II served as a catalyst for the formalisation of informed consent principles in international guidelines. The Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki laid the foundation for modern research ethics, emphasising the protection of human subjects and the importance of voluntary, informed participation in research.

Milestones in the 20th Century

The 20th century marked a pivotal era in the evolution of informed consent in research, with several key events shaping the landscape of research ethics as we know it today.

One of the most infamous incidents that spurred significant changes was the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Beginning in 1932, this study, which lasted for four decades, involved 400 African American men with syphilis who were denied treatment for research purposes. The unethical nature of this study highlighted the urgent need for robust ethical guidelines in human subjects research. It led to widespread public outrage, eroded trust in medical research, and ultimately resulted in stricter regulations and oversight of human subject research.

In response to such egregious ethical violations, the Belmont Report was published in 1979. This landmark document identified three fundamental ethical principles:

  1. Respect for Persons: Recognising individual autonomy and protecting those with diminished autonomy
  2. Beneficence: Maximising benefits while minimising harm to research participants
  3. Justice: Ensuring fair distribution of research benefits and burdens

These principles have since become the cornerstone of human subjects research ethics, guiding researchers in their pursuit of knowledge while safeguarding participants' rights and welfare.

The development of federal regulations, such as 45 CFR 46, followed suit. Known as the "Common Rule," 45 CFR 46 established requirements for informed consent, IRB review, and the protection of vulnerable populations. These regulations were crucial in ensuring that research involving human subjects adheres to ethical principles and protects participants.

Another significant advancement was the evolution of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). The National Research Act of 1974 mandated that all federally funded proposed research with human subjects be approved by an IRB. IRBs review research protocols, assess potential risks and benefits to participants, and ensure that informed consent procedures are adequate. This requirement institutionalised the ethical review process, adding an extra layer of protection for research participants.

Bottom line: The 20th century saw significant advancements in formalising and regulating informed consent processes. From the harsh lessons learned from unethical studies to the establishment of comprehensive ethical guidelines and regulatory bodies, these milestones have shaped the landscape of research ethics. Today, the principles established during this era continue to guide researchers in conducting ethical studies that respect and protect human subjects.

Challenges and Criticisms in the Late 20th and Early 21st Centuries

Despite significant progress in establishing informed consent as a cornerstone of ethical research, the late 20th and early 21st centuries saw persistent challenges in its implementation and effectiveness.

1. Lengthy and Complex Consent Documents

  • Consent forms grew increasingly long and intricate
  • Documents often resembled legal contracts rather than informative tools
  • Participants struggled to grasp key research implications

The Complexity of Consent Forms became a significant barrier. As research protocols became more sophisticated, consent documents expanded, making it difficult for participants to fully understand their involvement in studies.

2. Comprehension Difficulties

  • Participants frequently struggled to understand presented information
  • Raised questions about the validity of obtained consent
  • Highlighted the need for more effective communication strategies

Studies consistently revealed Comprehension Difficulties among research participants, undermining the very purpose of informed consent and emphasising the need for clearer communication methods.

3. Cultural and Linguistic Barriers

  • Globalised research landscape posed new challenges
  • Language barriers led to higher error rates and increased participant risk
  • Emphasised the importance of culturally appropriate consent processes

In an increasingly diverse research environment, Language Barriers in Informed Consent emerged as a significant hurdle, potentially compromising participant understanding and safety.

4. Debate over Traditional Consent Forms

  • Effectiveness of written documents questioned
  • Critics called for more innovative and interactive approaches
  • Focus on ensuring genuine understanding and voluntary participation

The reliance on traditional written consent forms faced growing criticism, with many arguing for more dynamic and engaging methods to ensure true informed consent.

Bottom line: Despite progress, informed consent faced ongoing challenges related to complexity and accessibility. The issues of lengthy documents, comprehension difficulties, cultural barriers, and debates over effectiveness all pointed towards the need for a more participant-centred approach to informed consent, highlighting the tension between legal requirements and ethical considerations in research participation.

Modern Approaches and the 2017 Common Rule Revisions

In our field of research ethics, we've witnessed significant changes in recent years, particularly with the 2017 revisions to the Common Rule. These revisions mark a pivotal moment in the history of informed consent, aiming to modernise regulations and strengthen protections for human subjects while reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens.

Key changes introduced by the 2017 revisions include:

  • Requirement for a Key Information Section at the beginning of consent forms
  • Focus on concise, understandable language to improve participant comprehension
  • Emphasis on strategies to enhance the informed consent process

To further enhance human subject protection, we've seen the following strategies emerge:

  1. Extended discussions: Researchers now engage in more in-depth conversations with participants, addressing specific concerns and ensuring a thorough understanding of the study. For instance, investigators might schedule multiple sessions to explain complex procedures or potential risks.
  2. Visual aids and multimedia: Complex procedures are explained using infographics, videos, or interactive presentations, making information more accessible and engaging. A researcher might use a 3D animation to illustrate a surgical procedure or an interactive app to demonstrate the timeline of a clinical trial.
  3. Family involvement: Especially for vulnerable populations or complex studies, family members or support persons are encouraged to participate in the consent process. This might involve allowing a trusted relative to be present during consent discussions or providing take-home materials for family review.

We've also observed a growing emphasis on addressing diverse participant needs, particularly in developing countries. This includes:

  • Translating materials into local languages and dialects
  • Adapting consent processes to align with cultural norms, such as involving community leaders in some settings
  • Considering varying literacy levels in information presentation, perhaps using pictorial consent forms or oral consent processes where appropriate
Bottom line: The 2017 Common Rule revisions represent a significant step towards making informed consent more accessible and comprehensible for all participants. By focusing on clear communication and considering diverse needs, these changes uphold the ethical principles that have been at the core of informed consent throughout its history.

The Current Regulatory Framework

Today, a robust regulatory framework governs informed consent in research, aiming to protect participants' rights and welfare. At its core is 45 CFR 46.116, which outlines the essential requirements for informed consent in the United States. This regulation ensures that researchers provide clear, comprehensible information about studies, risks, and benefits, emphasising voluntary participation.

Internationally, guidelines like the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH Good Clinical Practice have shaped local practices, creating a more standardised global approach to informed consent. These guidelines underscore the importance of ethical conduct in research across borders.

Ethics committees and Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) play a crucial role in ensuring proper consent. The IRB review process involves thorough examination of research protocols, evaluating whether they meet ethical standards, including the adequacy of the informed consent process. IRBs follow specific approval criteria, such as minimising risks to participants and ensuring equitable subject selection.

Balancing regulatory compliance with practical implementation remains a challenge, especially in international research. Studies funded by the US government but conducted abroad must adhere to US federal regulations or provide equivalent protections, highlighting the complexity of global research ethics.

Bottom line: While challenges persist, the current regulatory framework provides a solid foundation for ethical research that respects human dignity and autonomy. As researchers, we must navigate these regulations thoughtfully to ensure both compliance and meaningful scientific progress.

Future Directions and Ongoing Research

The field of informed consent in research continues to evolve, driven by the need to address current challenges and adapt to emerging technologies. Let's explore some key developments shaping the future of informed consent:

1. Enhancing Key Information Sections
Researchers are investigating innovative ways to present crucial study details more effectively:

  • Experimenting with different layouts and visual aids
  • Simplifying language for better comprehension
  • Developing interactive formats to engage participants

These efforts aim to make consent documents more accessible and understandable, addressing long-standing criticisms of complex and lengthy forms.

2. Leveraging Digital Technologies
The digital revolution is transforming how we approach informed consent:

  • Interactive consent platforms
  • Multimedia presentations
  • Virtual reality simulations for complex study procedures

These tools have the potential to make the consent process more engaging and comprehensible, particularly for diverse populations with varying literacy levels.

3. Tackling Ethical Challenges in Emerging Fields
As research expands into areas like big data and AI, new ethical considerations arise:

  • Ensuring data privacy and security
  • Addressing potential algorithmic bias
  • Developing guidelines for re-identification risks in large datasets

Researchers are actively working on adapting consent processes to these new frontiers, balancing scientific progress with participant protection.

4. Continuous Evaluation and Improvement
The key to effective informed consent is ongoing assessment and refinement:

  • Implementing regular effectiveness checks
  • Gathering participant feedback
  • Adapting practices based on real-world outcomes

This iterative process ensures that informed consent practices remain relevant and responsive to the changing landscape of research ethics.

Bottom line: The field of informed consent continues to evolve, with ongoing efforts to enhance its effectiveness and relevance. By embracing innovation while staying true to ethical principles, we're working to ensure that informed consent remains a cornerstone of responsible, participant-centred research.

Summary: Informed Consent's Evolving Role in Ethical Research

The history of informed consent in research is a compelling journey that reflects our growing commitment to ethical scientific inquiry. Let's revisit the key milestones that have shaped our current practices:

  • 1947: Nuremberg Code - Established voluntary consent as essential
  • 1964: Declaration of Helsinki - Emphasised participant protection
  • 1979: Belmont Report - Defined ethical principles for human subject research
  • 2017: Common Rule Revisions - Introduced Key Information Presentation requirement

These developments were largely driven by historical events that exposed the dire consequences of unethical research practices. The atrocities of World War II and scandals like the Tuskegee Syphilis Study underscored the critical need for robust ethical guidelines and participant protections, fundamentally reshaping our approach to research ethics.

Today, the Informed Consent Process remains the cornerstone of ethical research, encompassing:

  1. Disclosure of essential information
  2. Facilitation of understanding
  3. Promotion of voluntary decision-making

As researchers, it's our duty to go beyond mere compliance. We must ensure that participants truly understand what they're agreeing to. Here's how we can prioritise effective consent processes:

To stay updated on best practices, we recommend:

  • Regularly checking the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) website
  • Reading academic journals on research ethics
  • Engaging in ongoing training and discussions within your research teams

Remember, our commitment to informed consent is about respecting human dignity and upholding scientific integrity. Let's continue to improve our practices, ensuring that every participant's rights and well-being are at the forefront of our research. Together, we can set new standards for ethical research conduct and contribute to the ongoing evolution of informed consent in research.

How to Obtain Informed Consent in Research

Obtaining informed consent in research is not merely a formality but a fundamental ethical imperative. It represents a continuous process of communication and engagement with potential research participants, ensuring they clearly understand the study's nature, risks, and benefits before deciding to participate.

FAQ

What are the key elements of informed consent?

Informed consent requires providing comprehensive information about the study, including its purpose, procedures, potential risks and benefits, alternatives to participation, confidentiality measures, and the right to withdraw without penalty. The information should be presented in a clear, concise, and easily understandable manner.

Why is informed consent important?

Informed consent is crucial for protecting the rights and well-being of research participants. It ensures that individuals are not subjected to research without their knowledge and agreement, promoting autonomy and respect for persons.

Bibliography

  • Beecher, H.K., 1966. Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine, 274(24), pp.1354-1360.
  • World Medical Association, 2013. WMA Declaration of Helsinki-ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), pp.2191-2194.
  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. The Journal of the American College of Dentists, 46(2), pp.20-24.
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2018. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects 'Common Rule'.
  • Paasche-Orlow, M.K., Taylor, H.A. and Brancati, F.L., 2003. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(8), pp.721-726.
  • Flory, J. and Emanuel, E., 2004. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. Jama, 292(13), pp.1593-1601.
  • Manson, N.C. and O'Neill, O., 2007. Rethinking informed consent in bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services, n.d. Informed consent FAQs. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • Creswell, J.W., 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  • Fernandes, C.J., Cardoso, H., Rodrigues, R. and Mendes, I., 2018. Informed consent for clinical research: a narrative review. Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia, 24(6), pp.304-310.
  • Informed Consent — The Nuremberg Code (1947) — United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • The Nuremberg Code (1947). [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • The Tuskegee Timeline. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • The Tuskegee Syphilis Study and Its Implications for the 21st Century | Social Work Today. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • Belmont Report | HHS.gov. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • The Belmont Report - Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research | HHS.gov. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • Ethical Principles | Belmont: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research | UW Research. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • Paasche-Orlow, M.K., Taylor, H.A. and Brancati, F.L., 2003. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(8), pp.721-726.
  • Tam, W.W., Ho, S.Y., Lee, D.T., Yeung, D.K. and Wong, D.F., 2010. Comprehension and readability of informed-consent information for research and treatment: a systematic review. Journal of general internal medicine, 25(1), pp.69-77.
  • Albala, I., Doyle, J., Appelbaum, P.S. and Levine, R.J., 2010. International research ethics education for sites that conduct clinical trials. Academic medicine, 85(2), pp.224-233.
  • Informed Consent: Little Change, Steady Challenges: The Ochsner Journal. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • Revised Common Rule Q&A | Guidance | About the Revised Common Rule | Research | HHS.gov. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • Informed consent: Its evolution, purpose, and current challenges. [online] Available at: [Accessed 18 October 2023].
  • Informed consent for clinical trials: what changes with the new European regulation? [online] Available at:

Top Picks For You

View all